Review Manuscript (AOM Criteria)-Manuscript Evaluation Tool

Example

Determining if a manuscript's introduction clearly articulates a research question and provides compelling motivation.

Scenario

An author submits a manuscript on organizational behavior. The tool evaluates whether the introduction effectively motivates the study and presents an interesting research question that prompts further reading.

Example

Assessing the development and articulation of the theoretical framework, including concept definitions and literature integration.

Scenario

In a manuscript discussing leadership dynamics, the tool scrutinizes the clarity of core concepts and the logical flow from theory to hypotheses, ensuring the framework is robust and grounded in relevant literature.

Example

For empirical papers, analyzing the appropriateness of the sample, variables, data collection methods, and analytical techniques.

Scenario

Evaluating a study on corporate innovation, the tool checks if the sample size is sufficient, if the variables are well-chosen, if the data collection methods are sound, and if the analytical techniques are suitable for the research questions.

Example

Examining how results are reported and whether alternative explanations have been considered.

Scenario

In a manuscript on consumer behavior, it assesses the clarity with which results are presented and whether the analysis accounts for alternative explanations, enhancing the study's validity.

Example

Evaluating the manuscript's contribution to existing research and its implications for the scientific and practice community.

Scenario

Reviewing a manuscript on sustainability practices, the tool judges the novelty and value of the research contribution and discusses its potential impact on both academia and industry practices.