Legal Logic Assistant-Legal Argumentation Aid

Example

Legal norms are modeled as inference rules, enabling the structured representation and manipulation of legal arguments.

Scenario

In a privacy dispute involving unauthorized photo publication, the system can model arguments based on privacy protection norms against counterarguments citing public interest, applying preference rules to resolve the conflict.

Example

The system identifies conflicts among legal norms and uses preference relations to resolve them, ensuring a coherent legal argumentation process.

Scenario

When facing a conflict between a newer general statute and an older specific law, Legal Logic Assistant evaluates preference rules such as hierarchy, speciality, and posteriority to determine which norm prevails.

Example

It dynamically assesses the defensibility of arguments, categorizing them as justified, defensible, or defeated based on the evolving argumentation framework.

Scenario

In a legal debate, as new facts or norms are introduced, the system recalculates the status of existing arguments, aiding in the formulation of a legally sound conclusion.